Hello,
Me too. I will not be able to join. Apologies
—Alain
On 5 Nov 2018, at 10:09, Lars Fischer
<lars(a)nordu.net <mailto:lars@nordu.net>> wrote:
On 2 Nov 2018, at 16:09, ALAIN AINA wrote:
Ryan,
See that attached document with a couple of comments.
Alain, your comment D-2 is most timely. At some point - probably when preparing the
meta-data format - we have to review security implications of the information asked for,
and decide if we 1) only include information that is OK for public access, or 2) create a
mechanism for sharing mapping information only among trusted parties.
I will unfortunately not be able to join the meeting today. A few comments on the v0.7
draft document:
page numbers on the document would be nice
It might be a good idea to make explicit (in the Introduction, maybe?) that the data
format is also intended to be useful for static and offline maps.
There’s a couple of important comments on N-2 that I believe we should address in the
text
in a couple of place (N-4, V-2 being examples), there’s multi-tagging and extensible
tagging. I agree with those, but I think we should make it clear that tags must be
standardised, to ensure consistent use of the same tag for the same thing.
The point on subsea cable systems (L-6) is could be moved to L-10, as it’s really just
another way of doing waypoints.
I still think the reference to “central data base” (D-1) is too implementation specific
at this point.
I wish all a productive meeting today.
/Lars
--
Lars Fischer - Strategy & Policy, NORDUnet
lars(a)nordu.net <mailto:lars@nordu.net>, +45 2288 1729, @lpfischer
_______________________________________________
Gren-mapping-wg mailing list
Gren-mapping-wg(a)lists.nordu.net <mailto:Gren-mapping-wg@lists.nordu.net>
https://lists.nordu.net/listinfo/gren-mapping-wg
Alain P. AINA
CTO
WACREN
t: +228 90 04 24 74