10:24 p.m.
I had a thought.
Does GREN or GNA-G have an ASN?
If not we/it could probably get one.
My suggestion would be to use that ASN for a set of globally agreed to
communities and to create an as-set that represents the entirety of the
Global NREN community.
Thanks
On Tue, Apr 2, 2024 at 9:38 AM Steven Wallace <ssw(a)internet2.edu> wrote:
On 2 Apr 2024, at 10:33, Dale W. Carder wrote:
[Not an RPSL expert] For example, if an NREN that peers with Internet2
wishes to use the as-cone of Internet2 AND the as-cones of the NRENs
Internet2 provides transit as a basis for a prefix filter. Am I thinking
about this incorrectly?
--
===============================================
David Farmer Email:farmer@umn.edu
Networking & Telecommunication Services
Office of Information Technology
University of Minnesota
2218 University Ave SE Phone: 612-626-0815
Minneapolis, MN 55414-3029 Cell: 612-812-9952
===============================================
Thus spake Steven Wallace (ssw(a)internet2.edu) on
Mon, Apr 01, 2024 at
11:49:09AM -0400:
> Dave,
>
> I’ll update the document to be clearer. I’m suggesting that
> AS11537:AS-NREN-PEERS contains the ASNs of Internet2’s NREN peers, not
their
customer
cones. For example, AS11537:AS-NREN-PEERS would contain AS20965
(GEANT), among others. It wouldn’t contain AS20965:AS-CUSTOMERS or
AS20965:AS-NREN-PEERS.
What would be the use case for documenting that particularly in RPSL?
Dale