On 21 Dec 2016, at 10:34, Rasmus Lund wrote:
- On p.3, (Delivery) "For more on the specifics
on the DeIC and SUNET
products, please consult the NRENs.”
Could it be a good Idea to have a single point of contact in NORDUnet,
and perhaps appoint hugge as the “technial lead” to collect tech
info?
I think it will be a mess if they should contact each NREN for tech
specifics, as it usually causes unnecessary noise/confusion.
Problem is, then Hugge has to understand the fibre path or whatever it
is DeIC use to deliver in Copenhagen, and then explain it to ESS. It
don’t think that’s productive for Hugge or helpful for ESS.
-p3. as well. (Cost) "The cost for connectivity
to ESS Lund (SUNET)
and ESS Copenhagen (DeIC) should be agreed directly with the NRENs."
Same take as above, I thought the document should collect and present
1 total cost to ESS?
Yes, that was the original idea. However, it turns out that we can meet
their needs with standard NERN products. In that case having NORDUnet
“between” ESS and DeIC (say) adds nothing, and make everything more
complicated. So in the end we gave up on that.
/Lars
--
Lars Fischer - Strategy & Policy, NORDUnet
<lars(a)nordu.net>, +45 2288 1729, @lpfischer